MOM Alok’s thinking about conic sections again.

But this is impossible by definition

The 2 Aspects

(written long time ago, publish or languish)

Let \(H > \mathbb{Nat}\) be unlimited.

Nonstandard analysis gives a nice link between continuous and bounded functions, which are small and large-scale notions.¹

GPT-4 did this in 1 shot.

Been going through Mosteller’s 50 challenging problems in probability.

I’ve been learning about the neural tangent kernel and some things confused me.

You replied to my dissection post and I decided then that I wished to be your friend. You didn’t leave your email, but asked how old I was in earth years. My email is alokbeniwal@gmail.com, please reach out if you see this.

List as many emotions as you can. Then list their etymologies

No particular theme. Quoted text is me, rest is GPT.

(Old notes from 2016 that I stumbled upon).

I just finished a 1 month research program called REMIX (Redwood Research Mechanistic Interpretability Experiment).

For a finite set, one can describe a uniform distribution. There isn’t a natural way to do so for a countable set. But for a hyperfinite set, one can describe a uniform distribution through a probability density. So in some ways the countable is “bigger”.

What is an action?